CASE STUDY · INDUSTRIAL

GEARBOX HOUSING
DFM REVIEW

GEARBOX HOUSING
DFM REVIEW

Agentic design-for-manufacturing
with Nexus and SolidWorks

Tools Nexus · SolidWorks

Outcome 7 issues detected and resolved · 2–3 hrs saved · $140 saved per part

PAGE 02

WHAT’S INSIDE

WHAT’S INSIDE

A walk-through of how Nexus ran a design-for-manufacturing audit on a machined 6061-T6 gearbox housing in SolidWorks, independently matching an experienced engineer’s findings, then updating the CAD model itself. What the agent caught on its own, and where the engineer steered.

Summary

Nexus conducted a DFM study, modified CAD, saved $140/part and 60% of the engineer’s time.

P. 03

Problem

A precision part where 96% is machined away and reviewing the design is slow, senior-level work.

P. 03

Methodology

How Nexus reviewed the part, provided recommendations, and implemented the design changes the engineer selected.

P. 04

Results

The housing design, before and after the DFM review.

P. 05

Agent Design Input

Where the value compounds, the savings at volume, and the agent’s interpretation of the design.

P. 06

Try Nexus

How to bring the same workflow to your own DFM and CAD studies.

P. 07

PAGE 03

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Nexus conducted a full DFM review of a gearbox housing and implemented design updates directly in SolidWorks.

Nexus conducted a full DFM review of a gearbox housing and implemented design updates directly in SolidWorks.

Nexus worked with the engineer in SolidWorks to audit a machined 6061-T6 gearbox housing, flagged 7 issues an experienced engineer would raise, then made every approved change in the model. Together with Nexus, the engineer saved $140 per part and 60% of engineering time on this study.

60%

Engineering time saved

$140

Machining & scrap cost saved · per part

7

DFM issues identified

Time and cost are modeled engineering estimates (a junior-engineer workflow with senior review).

PROBLEM

PROBLEM

A gearbox housing has to hold bearing bores in precise alignment. As drawn, this particular design is expensive to manufacture, and identifying where cost can be reduced typically requires a senior engineer to conduct a design review.

01

High manufacturing expense

About 96% of the starting block is machined off, over thin walls three inches deep that are slow to cut and prone to distortion, leading to increased manufacturing costs.

02

Expert work, done manually

A thorough manufacturing pass across setups, tooling, tolerances and feature geometry is senior-engineer work. Each approved change is then made in the CAD model manually.

+

Benefit to engineer

Hand the design review of the part to the agent and it runs the first-pass audit at senior level, ranks the fixes by cost impact, and makes the design changes in the model following engineer approval. The engineer collaborates to judge the trade-offs and own the final review.

PAGE 04

METHODOLOGY

METHODOLOGY

The engineer briefed Nexus on the housing’s function, material (6061-T6) and process (CNC from billet), and objective to review the design. Nexus returned a prioritized list of issues and a proposed fix. The engineer reviewed and selected which design changes to make, and Nexus applied the design changes to the CAD model directly in SolidWorks, one at a time. Nexus proposed and the engineer confirmed.

As-modeled housing (interior and underside) · 6061-T6 · 238 cm³ finished · 3 bearing bores · 4 cover standoffs · 4 bottom standoffs · side slot

Prioritized DFM findings

Nexus-identified · engineer-reviewed

Priority

Manufacturing issue

Recommended change

P1

96% material removed from solid billet

Near-net cast blank at volume; CNC only functional faces

P1

1/16-in walls, 3-in-deep pocket (48:1)

Thicken walls to ≥0.125 in

P1

4–5 setups; features on 4+ faces

Consolidate setups; drop the slot and engraving

P2

Three tall island bearing bosses

Reduce boss height; blend into the floor/wall

P2

Non-standard bearing bore (Ø0.523 in)

Resize to Ø0.500 in with an H7 seat

P3

Small 0.030-in fillet radii

Open radii to 0.125 in

P3

Mixed #6-32 / #10-32 threads

Standardize threads to #10-32

PAGE 05

RESULTS

RESULTS

Feature

Before

After

Manufacturability gain

Wall thickness

0.0625 in (1/16″)

0.125 in

Heavier, faster passes; stiffer housing

Corner & fillet radii

0.030 in

0.125 in

Larger standard end-mills; stronger corners

Bearing bore

Ø0.523 in (non-standard)

Ø0.500 in (H7 seat)

Standard reamer & off-the-shelf bearings

Bearing-boss height

0.75 in

0.375 in

Shorter tools, less island clearing

Bottom standoffs

Protruding below base

Re-oriented inside; base planar

Underside finishes in one facing pass

Tapped holes

#6-32 & #10-32, through-all

#10-32, blind at 0.380 in

Fewer tap changes; simpler inventory

Side slot & engraving

Curved wall / 0.030-in cut

Removed

Fewer setups; a machining op eliminated

Nexus modified the CAD model in SolidWorks once the engineer approved Nexus’ proposed design changes.

Updated Housing Design

Reoriented Standoffs

Increased Wall Thickness & Radii

Reduced Boss Height & Thread Depth

PAGE 06

AGENT DESIGN INPUT

AGENT DESIGN INPUT

This exercise tested whether an agent could do the senior-level part of a DFM and the corresponding design changes. The design changes Nexus made reduced machining and scrap costs by about $140 per part.

+

Where the value compounds

The senior-level DFM review that used to gate every production release is now a repeatable step. Now this workflow lives in Nexus: reading the part, prioritizing the fixes and editing the model, running the same review on the next housing design will be faster.

Estimated cost savings at volume

Volume

Largest savings opportunity

Estimated total savings

Prototype (10 pcs)

Machining & scrap

$780–1,400

Low production (100 pcs)

Tooling standardization

$8,000–14,000

Production (500+ pcs)

Near-net casting vs machining

$50,000+ · per-part cost down 40–60%

+

Understands design principles

Nexus laid out what governs a good housing (bore alignment, center-distance control, datum strategy, stiffness) and reviewed against those principles.

$

Reduced manufacturing costs

Larger fillets, fewer setups, a standard bore and threads, thicker walls and simpler underside bosses eliminate about $140 in recurring machining and scrap cost from every gearbox housing.

→

The engineer’s next move

The engineer conducts a final DFM review of the Nexus-updated model, confirming the engineering intent is intact and no critical feature or function was lost, and makes a final decision on whether to proceed with near-net casting for volume production, per the agent’s recommendation. From there, the housing is ready for manufacturing.

Think through > click through.
Let Nexus handle the rest.

Think through > click through.
Let Nexus handle the rest.

Your AI Agent for Engineering Workflows

www.cosmon.com

The AI agent for mechanical engineers. Real engineering, inside your CAD, CAE and PLM tools.

2026, COSMON, Inc · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The AI agent for mechanical engineers. Real engineering, inside your CAD, CAE and PLM tools.

2026, COSMON,

Inc · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The AI agent for mechanical engineers. Real engineering, inside your CAD, CAE and PLM tools.

2026, COSMON, Inc · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED